10 Questions β’ Answer all questions and submit to see your results
Select one answer for each question
Quiz Complete! π
Answer Review
Review all questions with correct answers and explanations
π Revision Notes
Key takeaways from today’s quiz to strengthen your preparation
π΄ Revision Flashcards
Click each card to flip and test your recall
Should India prioritize governance continuity and cost savings through simultaneous elections despite concerns about federal autonomy, voter choice, and constitutional complexity, or maintain the current staggered system that preserves state-specific electoral mandates and allows continuous democratic feedback even if it means accepting periodic policy disruptions and higher electoral costs?
- If state governments fall mid-term or lose confidence votes under simultaneous elections, what happensβPresident’s rule until the next synchronized election cycle (undermining democracy), immediate elections (defeating the purpose), or some untested constitutional mechanism that could create more problems than it solves?
- Does conflating national and state elections force voters to choose based on national issues and central leadership rather than local concerns and state governance performance, effectively reducing state elections to referendums on the Prime Minister and undermining federalism?
- Would the massive costs of conducting nationwide simultaneous elections every five years (requiring enormous resources concentrated at one time) actually exceed the cumulative costs of staggered elections, and do claimed savings account for the democratic value of regular electoral feedback that staggered elections provide?
We’d love to hear your thoughts! Share your perspective in the comments.
π€ Found this useful? Help your friends stay updated too!