10 Questions β’ Answer all questions and submit to see your results
Select one answer for each question
Quiz Complete! π
Answer Review
Review all questions with correct answers and explanations
π Revision Notes
Key takeaways from today’s quiz to strengthen your preparation
π΄ Revision Flashcards
Click each card to flip and test your recall
Do wealthy nations have moral obligations to accept refugees in proportion to their capacity regardless of public opinion and integration difficulties, or should countries prioritize their citizens’ interests and social cohesion by limiting refugee intake, even if it means violating the spirit (if not letter) of international refugee law and leaving desperate people in dangerous situations?
- When host communities experience real challenges from rapid refugee influxβhousing shortages, school overcrowding, cultural tensions, labor market impactsβis dismissing these concerns as xenophobia intellectually dishonest, or are such concerns fundamentally rooted in prejudice that must be overcome through education rather than accommodated through reduced refugee acceptance?
- Should the international community accept that most refugees will never return home and therefore focus resources on permanent integration in host countries (requiring major investments but providing long-term solutions), or maintain the fiction of temporary protection hoping for eventual repatriation (cheaper short-term but potentially condemning refugees to decades in limbo)?
- Is the current refugee system fundamentally broken, concentrating displaced persons in neighboring poor countries while wealthy nations accept minimal numbers, and if so, should we abandon pretenses of “international responsibility sharing” for honest acknowledgment that geography and power determine who provides refuge, or double down on enforcement mechanisms compelling wealthy nations to accept fair shares?
We’d love to hear your thoughts! Share your perspective in the comments.
π€ Found this useful? Help your friends stay updated too!