10 Questions β’ Answer all questions and submit to see your results
Select one answer for each question
Quiz Complete! π
Answer Review
Review all questions with correct answers and explanations
π Revision Notes
Key takeaways from today’s quiz to strengthen your preparation
π΄ Revision Flashcards
Click each card to flip and test your recall
Should AI companies face moral obligations to refuse military contracts regardless of financial incentives and national security arguments, or do they have responsibilities to ensure their nations maintain technological superiority even if it means developing AI for defense purposes, accepting that adversaries will pursue military AI regardless of Western companies’ ethical qualms?
- When companies claim military AI contracts focus on “defensive” applications like cybersecurity or intelligence analysis, is this a meaningful ethical distinction, or does all military AI development inevitably contribute to offensive capabilities and autonomous weapons systems that cross ethical boundaries?
- If American AI companies refuse defense contracts on ethical grounds while Chinese and Russian firms face no such constraints, does this create dangerous military-technological asymmetries that could jeopardize democratic nations’ security, or is this concern overblown given that ethical restraint could prevent catastrophic AI arms races?
- Should there be international treaties prohibiting certain military AI applications (autonomous lethal decisions, deepfake warfare, AI-driven propaganda) similar to chemical weapons bans, or are such agreements impossible to verify and enforce, making them counterproductive security theater that only handicaps compliant nations?
We’d love to hear your thoughts! Share your perspective in the comments.
π€ Found this useful? Help your friends stay updated too!