“Financial integrity is not optional—it is the foundation of global security and economic stability.” — FATF Core Principle
In a decisive move ahead of the upcoming Financial Action Task Force (FATF) evaluation cycle, India is preparing to submit a comprehensive dossier aimed at reinstating Pakistan onto the FATF grey list in 2025. This action reflects growing concerns over Pakistan’s alleged lapses in curbing money laundering and terrorism financing, reigniting regional and global debates about financial transparency and security.
As the FATF intensifies its scrutiny of high-risk jurisdictions, India’s intervention underlines the continued geopolitical and financial ramifications of greylisting by the world’s foremost anti-financial crime body.
🌍 What is the Financial Action Task Force (FATF)?
The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) is an inter-governmental body established in 1989 at the G7 Summit in Paris to combat the growing threat of money laundering and terrorism financing. Comprising 40 member nations, including India, the United States, China, and the UK, the FATF formulates global standards—known as the 40 FATF Recommendations—to strengthen financial transparency and prevent illicit fund flows.
Its main functions include:
- Assessing countries’ AML/CTF (Anti-Money Laundering/Counter-Terrorist Financing) frameworks
- Issuing advisories and compliance reports
- Maintaining global monitoring lists: the grey list and black list
Through its Mutual Evaluation Reports (MERs), the FATF tracks compliance and guides reforms for non-compliant or high-risk nations.
Think of FATF as the world’s financial police chief. Just like a police department tracks criminals, FATF tracks countries that allow dirty money and terrorism funding to flow through their banks. Countries that fail the test get placed on a “watch list” (grey list) or “most wanted list” (black list).
⚖️ FATF Grey List and Black List Explained
The FATF enforces compliance via two major listings:
| Aspect | Grey List | Black List |
|---|---|---|
| Official Name | Jurisdictions Under Increased Monitoring | High-Risk Jurisdictions |
| Meaning | Strategic AML/CTF deficiencies but committed to reform | Serious failures with no political will to reform |
| Current Count (2025) | 24 countries | 3 countries (North Korea, Iran, Myanmar) |
| Consequences | Enhanced due diligence, investment decline, reputational damage | Economic sanctions, trade isolation, banking boycott |
| Monitoring | Close monitoring and periodic reporting | International countermeasures and sanctions |
Consequences of Greylisting:
- Decreased investor confidence
- Delays in loans from global financial institutions like the IMF
- Enhanced due diligence by international banks
- Damage to sovereign credit ratings
Don’t confuse: Grey list countries are “under monitoring” while black list countries face “countermeasures and sanctions.” Grey listed nations are working with FATF to reform; black listed nations have refused to cooperate or made no progress.
📜 Pakistan’s Grey List History (2018–2022)
Between 2018 and 2022, Pakistan was placed on the FATF grey list due to repeated failures in monitoring terror financing and enforcing AML regulations. Key issues cited included:
- Inadequate action against UN-designated terrorist groups
- Weak regulatory supervision of non-profit and financial sectors
- Failure to prosecute and convict key terror financiers
During its greylisting:
- Foreign investments into Pakistan dipped significantly
- IMF and World Bank loans became conditional on FATF compliance
- Terrorist funding channels into regions like Jammu & Kashmir saw disruptions, according to Indian officials
The FATF removed Pakistan from the grey list in October 2022 following substantial commitments, but India and other watchdogs argue that some of those reforms were either temporary or under-implemented.
Key Fact: Pakistan spent 4 years (2018-2022) on FATF grey list. During this period, foreign direct investment dropped sharply and international loans became harder to secure—critical points likely to appear in MCQs on international relations and global finance.
📌 India’s 2025 FATF Dossier: Key Allegations
India is now preparing a detailed dossier for FATF review, expected to present:
- Evidence of continued financing of proscribed terrorist entities
- Non-compliance with FATF Recommendation 6, which targets financial support to terrorism
- Surveillance data suggesting money trails linked to cross-border insurgency
- Concerns about shell companies and non-profit misuse in funding subversive activities
According to Indian officials, the intention is not political but rooted in regional and global financial stability. India aims to:
- Reinstate monitoring pressure on Pakistan
- Prevent terror-linked fund flows into conflict zones
- Enhance South Asia’s financial integrity
Is FATF purely a technical body, or has it become a tool of geopolitical influence? India’s timing—submitting a dossier in 2025 just three years after Pakistan’s removal—raises questions about whether financial watchdogs can remain politically neutral when member states have bilateral tensions.
💰 Impact of Greylisting on National Economies
When a country is placed on the FATF grey list, the consequences go beyond reputational damage. Greylisted nations often face:
1. Foreign Investment Decline
Investors perceive increased risk and regulatory uncertainty. Pakistan experienced a sharp dip in FDI during its 2018–2022 greylisting period.
2. Loan and Aid Restrictions
Global lenders like the IMF and World Bank impose stricter conditions. Greylisting often delays disbursement of critical financial support.
3. Banking Limitations
Global banks and financial institutions conduct enhanced due diligence. Cross-border transactions become costlier and slower.
4. Policy Pressure
Countries are required to overhaul financial regulations. Significant legal and institutional reforms become necessary to exit the list.
For emerging economies like Pakistan, these effects can disrupt development and create fiscal stress, limiting their global integration.
🔍 FATF: A Global Watchdog for Financial Integrity
As the premier global body for monitoring financial misconduct, the FATF is more than just a compliance agency—it is a tool of financial diplomacy. Its mandates contribute to:
Standardization Across Borders
FATF Recommendations offer a uniform AML/CTF framework for 200+ jurisdictions.
Early Warning Systems
Regular evaluations uncover vulnerabilities before they escalate.
International Cooperation
FATF facilitates collaboration between nations in tracking illicit fund flows.
Policy Influence
Being on a FATF list influences a country’s access to global financial systems and forums.
FATF’s findings are increasingly used by governments, multinational corporations, and financial institutions to assess country risk.
🌐 Comparative Spotlight: FATF Scrutiny on Other Nations
India’s demand for re-evaluation of Pakistan aligns with similar precedents globally. Here’s how FATF scrutiny impacted others:
- Iran: On the FATF black list, facing near-total banking isolation and trade sanctions
- Myanmar: Blacklisted for institutional breakdowns and military-linked financial abuses
- Malta: Greylisted in 2021 over high-risk banking practices; quickly implemented reforms and was delisted by 2022
These examples highlight FATF’s expanding influence and the global importance of compliance.
Click to flip • Master key facts
For GDPI, Essay Writing & Critical Analysis
5 questions • Instant feedback
FATF was established in 1989 at the G7 Summit in Paris to combat money laundering and terrorism financing.
FATF has 40 member nations, including India, USA, China, and the UK.
Pakistan was on the FATF grey list from 2018 to 2022, a period of 4 years.
FATF Recommendation 6 specifically targets the financing of terrorism and terrorist organizations.
Pakistan is NOT on the black list. The current black list includes only North Korea, Iran, and Myanmar. Pakistan was removed from the grey list in October 2022.
